Double materiality assessment

In our Double Materiality Assessment, we evaluate how sustainability matters affect both our business and the world around us—people, the environment, and society.

Description of the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities and material information to be reported

Our double materiality assessment follows a structured, iterative process conducted in late 2024, constituting a full DMA from scratch. This is our second full DMA, following our first in 2023.

Prior to 2023, we conducted a single materiality assessment that did not follow the double materiality approach.

The assessment was not informed by a formal sustainability due diligence process, as none is currently in place; the DMA itself serves as our primary mechanism for identifying and assessing sustainability-related impacts, risks and opportunities.

We began by mapping all ESRS sustainability topics, results from our previous assessment, sector-relevant topics, and entity-specific matters.

After an initial screening, we created a long list of 63 matters, refined through further research into a short list of 20 material sustainability matters.

For E1 – Climate Change, G1 – Business Conduct, and S1 – Own Workforce, we assessed these at topic level rather than subtopic level, given our size and scope of impact.

The scope of our assessment covers our own operations as the primary focus, with upstream activities — particularly Tier 1 suppliers and subcontractors — also considered where we have the most influence or where significant impacts are most likely to occur.

Downstream impacts were reviewed but carry less weight, reflecting where our leverage and exposure are greatest.

 

CSRD:

Stakeholder engagement & inputs We used our 2023 stakeholder survey — covering employees, customers, suppliers and their representatives — as a baseline. In 2024, we placed greater emphasis on external data sources compared to 2023, including ENCORE, Embuild publications, Circular Flanders, the World Economic Forum Risk Report, and High Water Risk Area data, cross-referencing these with our own multi-year KPIs. We also conducted eight internal expert interviews (e.g., QHSE coordinator, Group Legal Counsel).

Impact materiality Impacts are assessed on a gross basis across four dimensions: Scale, Scope, Irremediability, and Likelihood, each scored 1–5. A score of 3 (“important”) serves as the materiality threshold. While impacts are scored without factoring in existing prevention or mitigation measures, these are taken into account at a later stage when defining our action lens and reporting on material topics. Mitigation and remediation actions are addressed separately within each topic-level disclosure.

Financial materiality Financial materiality is assessed by summing magnitude and likelihood scores, with a threshold of ≥ 6. Inputs included qualitative interviews with the Cordeel Group CFO, the CFO of Cordeel Nederland, and four financial partners. Dependencies on natural and social resources — such as water availability in stressed regions and raw material supply chains — were explicitly factored into the scoring.

 

 

Areas of heightened risk We operate in Belgium, the Netherlands, Hungary, Poland, Serbia, Bulgaria, and Germany, with the majority of our revenue concentrated in Belgium and the Netherlands.

As most of our suppliers and subcontractors operate in these regions, our supply chain is not significantly exposed to high-risk geographies, and no specific business relationships were identified as carrying heightened risk profiles beyond those captured through our operational and geographic risk considerations.

Demolition and excavation activities are fully subcontracted to specialised parties.

Several operations in Flanders and the south/southwest of the Netherlands are located in high or extremely high water stress areas. Despite this, our water consumption remains low relative to other sectors, and water withdrawals were limited with above-average infiltration rates. As a result, E3 – Water did not meet our materiality threshold, though we continue to monitor it.

Changes from prior period The 2024 assessment placed greater emphasis on external data sources to benchmark and validate our internal data, representing the primary process-level change compared to 2023.  driven in part by our land bank of over 1 million m² in Belgium, a significant portion of which is greenfield.

The assessment was validated by our Board of Directors and will be updated annually.

CSRD:

What is material to Cordeel

Further detail on how each material topic is managed is provided in the respective topical disclosures within this sustainability statement.

 

ESRS Sustainability matter Positive/ negative Actual/ potential Impact material Financially material
S1 Own Workforce Negative Potential Yes Yes
G1 Business Conduct Negative Potential Yes Yes
E1 Climate Change Negative Actual Yes Yes
Entity specific (E1) Embodied carbon of buildings Negative Actual Yes Yes
E5 Resource inflows & use Negative Actual Yes Yes
E5 Waste Negative Actual Yes Yes
Entity specific (E5) Circularity Positive Potential Yes Yes
E4 Biodiversity, land-use Negative Actual Yes Yes
Entity specific Innovation Positive Potential Yes Yes
S2 Health & Safety of value chain Negative Potential Yes No
E5 Resource outflows Negative Potential No No
S2 Forced labour Negative Potential No No
S2 Adequate wages Negative Potential No No
E3 Water withdrawals Negative Potential No No
E2 Pollution of soils Negative Potential No No
S2 Adequate housing Negative Potential No No
E2 Noise pollution Negative Actual No No
E3 Water discharges Negative Potential No No
E2 Pollution of air Negative Actual No No
E3 Water consumption Negative Actial No No
CSRD:

Changes compared to the prior reporting period:

E3 – Water, previously considered material, was removed following additional desk research confirming relatively low water consumption and limited withdrawals generally accompanied by ground infiltration, supported by industry benchmarking.

E4 – Biodiversity was added as a double material topic, driven in part by our land bank of over 1 million m² in Belgium, a significant portion of which is greenfield.

 

Supplementary information:

Entity-specific disclosures are provided for three topics identified through our materiality assessment: embodied carbon of buildings, circularity, and innovation.

Additionally, selected metrics, narrative context and targets for E2 – Pollution and E3 – Water are included as part of our nature strategy, outside the full topical standard approach. These supplementary disclosures are clearly identified as such in the content index.

CSRD:

Content index and EU legislation datapoints:

A content index listing all disclosure requirements complied with, their locations within this sustainability statement, and a separate indication of those incorporated by reference, is provided in the annex.

The annex also includes a complete table of all datapoints deriving from other EU legislation as listed in Appendix A of ESRS 2, with direct links to the respective datapoints or an indication where they have been assessed as not material.

 

Double materiality matrix

Sustainability matters with big bullet size are double material to use.

    Sustainable buildings
  • 1
     Embodied carbon
  • 2
     Circularity
  • 3
     Innovation
  • Sustainable operations
  • 4
     Biodiversity
  • 5
     Climate Change
  • 6
     Resource inflows
  • 7
     Waste
  • 8
     Resource outflows
  • 9
     Water withdrawals
  • 10
     Water discharges
  • 11
     Water consumption
  • 12
     Pollution of soil
  • 13
     Noise pollution
  • 14
     Pollution of air
  • Our people
  • 15
     Own workforce
  • Impact on society
  • 16
     Business conduct
  • 17
     Health & Safety (Value Chain)
  • 18
     Forced Labour (Value Chain)
  • 19
     Aqequate wages (Value Chain)
  • 20
     Adequate housing (Value Chain)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Impact materiality
Financial materiality